Actually I was thinking more about the weights that may not be used for @font-face right now.
Since the idea behind WOFF and CWF is to alleviate foundries’ concerns about font piracy while enabling customers to use the fonts online, I have a small ray of hope there.
5 Comments
August 26, 2009 at 1:57 pm
What’s your opinion on the web font debate?
EOT lite and a possible new format are being developed and quite a lot of foundries seem to accept that.
Do you see any chances that we might be able to use your gorgeous Calluna in other than the free styles on web pages in the future?
August 28, 2009 at 1:25 pm
I would love to have people use all my fonts for the web, but I’m still thinking about how that should be done best in my case.
October 21, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Mozilla has already implemented WOFF (http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2009/10/20/mozilla-supports-web-open-font-format/), any ideas on your side yet?
October 22, 2009 at 7:42 am
Yes, I will support the WOFF format for the fonts that can already be used for @font-face embedding.
October 25, 2009 at 8:37 am
Actually I was thinking more about the weights that may not be used for @font-face right now.
Since the idea behind WOFF and CWF is to alleviate foundries’ concerns about font piracy while enabling customers to use the fonts online, I have a small ray of hope there.